An Educational Not for Profit focused on Federal Internet and Telecommunications Policy
Wednesday, September 05, 2018
NTIA Virginia Broadband Summit Oct. 30, 2018
Tuesday, October 04, 2016
✏️ NTIA, NSF Seek Comments to Shape National Broadband Research Agenda
- Broadband technology
- Broadband access and adoption
- Socioeconomic impacts
- Opportunities for federal leadership
Thursday, August 11, 2016
NTIA Big Sky Broadband Workshop
"The Big Sky Broadband Workshop will be held on August 31, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., and September 1, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Mountain Daylight Time."
"The meeting will be held in Montana at the Hilton Garden Inn, 3720 N. Reserve St., Missoula, MT 59808."
Fed Reg Notice
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
FCC Broadband Privacy NPRM RFC
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-338679A2.docx
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-338679A3.docx
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-338679A4.docx
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-338679A1.pdf
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-338679A2.pdf
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-338679A3.pdf
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-338679A4.pdf
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-39A2.docx
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-39A3.docx
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-39A4.docx
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-39A5.docx
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-39A6.docx
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-39A1.pdf
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-39A2.pdf
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-39A3.pdf
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-39A4.pdf
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-39A5.pdf
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-39A6.pdf
Thursday, February 25, 2016
Thursday, October 22, 2015
:: NTIA Twenty-Fifth Quarterly Status Report to Congress Regarding BTOP
Thursday, October 08, 2015
: NTIA California Community Broadband Forum Nov. 17
Thursday, October 01, 2015
:: NTIA BroadbandUSA: Guide to Federal Funding of Broadband Projects
BroadbandUSA: Guide to Federal Funding of Broadband Projects
Monday, August 11, 2014
FCC RFC :: 10th Sec. 706 NOI
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_
INTRODUCTION
1. Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as amended (1996 Act), requires the Commission to determine and report annually on “whether advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion.”[1] This Notice of Inquiry (Inquiry) initiates the Commission’s assessment of the “availability of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans (including, in particular, elementary and secondary schools and classrooms).”[2] In conducting this Inquiry, the Commission must “determine whether advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion” and, if the answer is negative, the Commission “shall take immediate action to accelerate deployment of such capability” through a variety of means.[3] In this Inquiry, we solicit data and information that will help the Commission make this determination.2. On August 21, 2012, the Commission released the Ninth Broadband Progress Notice of Inquiry.[4] We asked questions in the Ninth Broadband Progress Notice of Inquiry and have not issued a corresponding report.[5] To what extent do those questions remain relevant or need to be resolved? Since that last inquiry, there have been numerous noteworthy developments in the broadband market and the Commission has continued to take significant steps to accelerate the deployment of modern communications networks. For example, since the last report, the Commission has implemented a second round of Phase I of the Connect America Fund to promote the deployment of broadband-capable infrastructure and more than $438 million in funding has been disbursed, which will bring new broadband service to more than 1.6 million unserved Americans in the next several years.[6]3. With this Inquiry, we start anew by analyzing current data and seeking information that will enable the Commission to conduct an updated analysis for purposes of its next report. In particular, we seek comment on the benchmarks we should use to define “advanced telecommunications capability,” explore whether we should establish separate benchmarks for fixed and mobile services, which data we should rely on in measuring broadband, whether and how we should take into account differences in broadband deployment, particularly between urban areas versus non-urban and Tribal areas, and other issues. We seek comment on whether we should modify the 4 megabits per second (Mbps) download and 1 Mbps upload (4 Mbps/1 Mbps) speed benchmark we have relied on in the past reports. We also seek comment on whether we should consider latency and data usage allowances as additional core characteristics of advanced telecommunications capability.[7]We seek comment on how to address mobile and satellite services data in our section 706 report and on ways to improve the evaluation of mobile and satellite services data. We also seek comment on whether we should establish separate benchmarks for fixed and mobile services, and under what circumstances mobile services may itself satisfy the definition of advanced telecommunications capability and therefore serve as a functional equivalent for fixed broadband that satisfies the definition. For areas where multiple providers have deployed service but none of the services, standing alone, satisfies the broadband benchmark, how (if at all) should we evaluate that deployment for our determination under section 706? Finally, we seek comment on how to improve our analysis concerning broadband availability at elementary and secondary schools. We encourage parties to provide any information that might be useful in our evaluation of broadband availability and welcome innovative ideas on how the Commission can best increase and accelerate broadband availability throughout the nation. We welcome input on all matters relevant to this Inquiry, and seek information on the specific issues set forth below.
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Sunday, June 16, 2013
PR :: NIST and NTIA Announce Plans to Establish New Center for Advanced Communications
- multiuser test beds that allow government and industry researchers to realistically measure and evaluate the performance of new advanced communications technologies;
- targeted interdisciplinary research, development and testing projects in fields such as digital information processing, interoperability and quantum communications; and
- outreach to international standards development organizations to help ensure compatibility of U.S. advanced communications efforts with the global marketplace.
Thursday, June 14, 2012
[NOTICE] Making Broadband Construction Faster and Cheaper
Making Broadband Construction Faster and Cheaper
[Phil Larson] Tomorrow, the President will sign an Executive Order to make broadband construction along Federal roadways and properties up to 90 percent cheaper and more efficient. Currently, the procedures for approving broadband infrastructure projects on properties controlled or managed by the Federal Government—including large tracts of land, roadways, and more than 10,000 buildings across the Nation—vary depending on which agency manages the property. The new Executive Order will ensure that agencies charged with managing Federal properties and roads take specific steps to adopt a uniform approach for allowing broadband carriers to build networks on those assets. It will also allow service providers to deploy broadband while roads are under construction, a practice that hugely cuts costs.
Additionally, at an event beginning at 9am ET tomorrow, the White House will announce that nearly 100 partners—including cities, national research institutions, and industry supporters—have formed a new public-private partnership called “US Ignite.” The US Ignite Partnership will create a new wave of services that take advantage of state-of-the-art broadband networks running up to 100 times faster than today’s Internet. By bringing together government agencies, private companies, and communities, the partnership aims to accelerate the development of applications for advanced manufacturing, medical monitoring, emergency preparedness, and a host of other services. These applications will improve services to Americans, drive job creation, promote innovation, and create new markets for American businesses.
The President’s Executive Order and the US Ignite partnership are a two-pronged approach to help speed the delivery of connectivity to communities, businesses, and schools across the Nation. “By connecting every corner of our country to the digital age,” President Obama said. “We can help our businesses become more competitive, our students become more informed, and our citizens become more engaged."![]()
Learn more about US Ignite’s current projects in Cleveland, OH, Chattanooga, TN, and Clemson/Portland.
For a complete list of US Ignite’s partners and initiatives across the country, check out their interactive map.
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
FCC RFC Lightsquared Petition for Declaratory Ruling - Comments Due Feb. 27
"To date, the Interference-Resolution Process has not been completed. Although LightSquared submitted, as a required step in the Process, the final report of the technical working group that it co-chaired with the U.S. GPS Industry Council (USGIC), the Commission issued a Public Notice calling for public comment on the report5 and has since asked for additional technical submissions and testing. In reply comments filed in connection with the Public Notice, LightSquared raised a full range of issues regarding the scope of interference protection to which GPS receivers are entitled.
"Separately, in the Report and Order in ET Docket No. 10-142, which focused on the addition of terrestrial service allocations to the 2 GHz MSS band, the Commission briefly discussed the Conditional Waiver Order and the Interference-Resolution Process.7 The U.S. GPS Industry Council (USGIC) filed a petition for reconsideration in that docket, requesting a statement from the Commission that the GPS community is not required to share responsibility for resolving interference issues with MSS ATC providers like LightSquared.8 The USGIC Recon Petition, which is pending, contends that MSS licensees providing ATC service are required to protect GPS receivers from interference caused by such terrestrial operations, and that the Commission has placed the obligation to resolve harmful interference on those MSS licensees.9 LightSquared opposed the USGIC Recon Petition, raising many of the same arguments contained in its Petition for Declaratory Ruling.10
"On December 23, 2011, the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2012 (2012 General Government Appropriations Act) was enacted into law as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012.11 Section 628 of the 2012 General Government Appropriations Act prohibits the Commission from using any funds made available by that Act “to remove the conditions imposed on commercial terrestrial operations in the Order and Authorization adopted by the Commission on January 26, 2011 (DA 11-133) [i.e., the Conditional Waiver Order], or otherwise permit such operations, until the Commission has resolved concerns of potential widespread harmful interference by such commercial terrestrial operations to commercially available Global Positioning System devices.”
"Accordingly, interested parties are invited to file comments in response to LightSquared’s petition for declaratory ruling in IB Docket No. 11-109 or ET Docket No. 10-142, as appropriate, no later than 30 days after the release date of this public notice. Parties may file replies in response to those comments in IB Docket No. 11-109 or ET Docket No. 10-142, as appropriate, no later than 15 days after the date that comments are due.
"This proceeding shall be treated as a “permit-but-disclose” proceeding in accordance with the Commission’s ex parte rules.13 Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1) list all persons attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was made, and (2) summarize all data presented and arguments made during the presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the presenter’s written comments, memoranda or other filings in the proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission’s ex parte rules.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/
Thursday, July 07, 2011
FCC Establishes Comment Deadlines Re GPS Lightsquared Report


- Comments Due: 07/30/2011. Reply Comments Due: 08/15/2011. Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS
.
- "On June 30, 2011, LightSquared Subsidiary LLC (LightSquared) submitted a final report of the technical working group co-chaired by LightSquared and the United States Global Positioning System (GPS) Industry Council (USGIC)1 and organized in response to a condition in FCC Order and Authorization, DA 11-133 (released January 26, 2011).2 The condition required that LightSquared help organize and participate in a technical working group “that brings LightSquared and the GPS community together” to address potential interference issues recently raised by members of the GPS community.3 The Order “envision[ed] a working group in which cooperative and candid discussions can ensue, and where information, including proprietary information, can be shared among the participants with appropriate measures in place to protect the confidentiality of that information.”4 The condition required submission of a final report that includes the working group’s analyses of the potential for overload interference to GPS devices from LightSquared’s terrestrial network of base stations, technical and operational steps to avoid any such interference, and specific recommendations going forward to mitigate potential interference to GPS devices. Among other things,5 the Order also made clear that, “as a condition of granting this waiver, the [working group] process . . . addressing the interference concerns regarding GPS must be completed to the Commission’s satisfaction before LightSquared commences offering commercial service pursuant to this waiver on its L-band MSS frequencies.”"
The technical working group effort identified significant technical issues related to potential LightSquared operations in the upper portion of the L-Band, which is most proximate to the band used by GPS. Over more than three months, the technical working group tested more than 130 representative devices in seven different receiver categories, in a number of different test environments. The tests demonstrated potentially significant interference between LightSquared operations in the upper portion of the band and various GPS receivers. The tests also identified some interference issues in the lower 10 MHz portion of the band. The overall conclusion of the testing is that transmissions in the upper 10 MHz channel —the channel nearest to the 1559-1610 MHz GPS band — will adversely affect the performance of a significant number of legacy GPS receivers.
In addition to the technical working group report, LightSquared has submitted its recommendations to address the problems identified by the working group.7 In particular, LightSquared indicates its willingness to: (1) operate at lower power than permitted by its existing FCC authorization; (2) agree to a “standstill” in the terrestrial use of its Upper 10 MHz frequencies immediately adjacent to the GPS band; and (3) commence terrestrial commercial operations only on the lower 10 MHz portion of its spectrum and to coordinate and share the cost of underwriting a workable solution for the small number of legacy precision measurement devices that may be at risk. We specifically invite comment on these recommendations, including any alternative proposals to enable these two important services – GPS devices and L-band mobile broadband – to co-exist. We also welcome comments on the technical working group report generally. Comments should be filed no later than July 30, 2011, and reply comments by August 15, 2011.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
[Public Notice] FCC Bureau Seeks Comment On “Need For Speed” Information For Consumers Of Broadband Services

“The marketplace for broadband service is a confusing one for consumers,” says CGB Bureau Chief Joel Gurin. “Most people don’t understand megabits-per-second in the way they understand miles-per-gallon.” Gurin notes that an FCC Survey last year found that 80 percent of people with broadband don’t even know what speed they’re getting from their service. “Broadband service providers recognize the problem, and have taken some good steps to educate consumers,” says Gurin. “This Public Notice will provide a way for internet service providers, the tech community, and the public to help develop clear guidelines that will help everyone understand how to get the service they need.”
"In the Public Notice, CGB notes that consumers may have very different needs for broadband service depending on what they use it for. Someone who uses the Web primarily for email, for example, may be well served by a smaller and less expensive service than an avid video viewer would need. Others, such as online gamers, may be especially concerned about factors like signal latency.
"The Public Notice http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-661A1.pdf recognizes the importance of collecting input from a broad range of stakeholders on broadband speed and performance. The Bureau also says that this Notice builds on the work of a voluntary group of service providers and consumer groups that have met with the Commission to help guide the FCC’s national testing of broadband speed and performance.
Comments are due May 26, 2011 and replies June 16, 2011.
- FCC -
CG Docket 09-158
CGB contact: Ellen Satterwhite at (202) 418-3626; ellen.satterwhite@fcc.gov
For Immediate Release: News Media Contact:
April 11, 2011 Rosemary Kimball at (202) 418-0511
e-mail: rosemary.kimball@fcc.gov
4/11/11 FCC Bureau Seeks Comment on "Need for Speed" Information for Consumers of Broadband Services. News Release: Word | Acrobat Public Notice: Word | Acrobat