Thursday, April 27, 2006

FCC Sunshine Notice May 3 :: CALEA :: TRS :: USAC ::

FCC TO HOLD OPEN COMMISSION MEETING
WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 2006

The Federal Communications Commission will hold an
Open Meeting on the subjects listed below on
Wednesday, May 3, 2006, which is scheduled to commence
at 9:30 a.m. in Room TW-C305, at 445 12th Street,
S.W., Washington, D.C.

ITEM NO. BUREAU SUBJECT
1 OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY TITLE:
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act and
Broadband Access and Services (ET Docket No. 04-295).
SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Report and
Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order regarding
implementation of the Communications Assistance for
Law Enforcement Act.

2 CONSUMER & GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS TITLE:
Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech
Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities (CG Docket No. 03-123).
SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Declaratory
Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding
interoperability of Video Relay Service.

3 CONSUMER & GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS TITLE:
Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech
Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities (CG Docket No. 03-123).
SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to address fraudulent
use of the Internet-based forms of Telecommunications
Relay Service.

4 WIRELINE COMPETITION TITLE: Request for Review of
the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by
Bishop Perry Middle School, New Orleans, LA et al.,
Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support
Mechanism (WC Docket No. 02-6).
SUMMARY: The Commission will consider an Order
addressing requests for review of decisions of the
Universal Service Administrator with respect to the
Schools and Libraries Universal Service support
mechanism.

5
WIRELINE COMPETITION TITLE: Request for Review of the
Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by
Lake Grove at Maple Valley, Inc., Lake Grove Schools,
Wendall, MA, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal
Service Support Mechanism (WC Docket No. 02-6).
SUMMARY: The Commission will consider an Order
addressing requests for review of decisions of the
Universal Service Administrator with respect to the
Schools and Libraries Universal Service support
mechanism.

=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
Cybertelecom :: Federal Internet Law & Policy www.cybertelecom.org

arlhoc.blogspot.com Washington D.C. Youth Hockey News

Monday, April 24, 2006

House Judiciary Net Neutral Hearing April 25

http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/netneutralitymedadv42405.pdf

Telecom and Antitrust Task Force Hearing Tuesday
on Network Neutrality

What: Oversight Hearing entitled, “Network Neutrality:
Innovation, Competition and Nondiscriminatory Access”
Who: Telecom and Antitrust Task Force – Rep. F. James
Sensenbrenner, Jr. (R-Wis.), Chairman

When: 2:00 p.m., Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Where: 2141 Rayburn Building

THIS HEARING IS EXPECTED TO EXPLORE...
. What is “net neutrality?”
. Does net neutrality promote innovation and
competition?
. Can broadband service providers “control” access to
the Internet?
. Have broadband providers engaged in illegal or
discriminatory conduct in violation of net
neutrality principles?
. How have recent legal and regulatory developments
affected competition for broadband
services?
. How can broadband providers abuse their market power
to limit access to Internet
content? Do they have an economic incentive to do so?
. How would access-tiering affect the competitive
landscape of the telecommunications
market or the open architecture of the Internet?
. How does recent consolidation in the
telecommunications marketplace affect broadband
access?
. Can a network provider effectively manage network
access or should a statutory
definition of network neutrality be adopted by
Congress? What restrictions, if any,
should be placed on the network provider to ensure a
competitive marketplace?
. What current authority exists to protect net
neutrality?
. Would legislative proposals being considered by
Congress promote or undermine net
neutrality?
. What is the role of antitrust in preventing Internet
“discrimination”?
WITNESSES: Mr. Paul Misener, Vice President of Global
Public Policy, Amazon.com; Mr. Earl W.
Comstock, President and CEO, COMPTEL; Mr. Walter B.
McCormick, President and CEO, United
States Telecom Association; and Mr. Timothy Wu,
Professor of Law, Columbia Law School.

Thursday, April 20, 2006

RFC FCC :: AT&T / BS Merger

COMMISSION SEEKS COMMENT ON APPLICATION FOR
CONSENT TO TRANSFER OF CONTROL FILED BY
AT&T INC. and BELLSOUTH CORPORATION

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-904A1.doc

WC Docket No. 06-74

PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED

Comments/Petitions Due: June 5, 2006
Responses/Oppositions to Petitions Due: June 20, 2006

AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”) and BellSouth Corporation
(“BellSouth”) (collectively, “the Applicants”) have
filed a series of applications pursuant to sections
214 and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended and section 2 of the Cable Landing License
Act. In these applications, the Applicants seek
Commission approval of the transfer of control to AT&T
of licenses and authorizations held directly and
indirectly by BellSouth. This transfer of control
will take place as a result of a proposed acquisition
whereby BellSouth will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of AT&T. These transfer of control
applications pertain to domestic and international
section 214 authorizations, cable landing licenses,
Part 25 satellite earth station authorizations,
various wireless licenses and Part 5 Experimental
Radio Service licenses.

The Applicants also seek consent to the transfer of
control of Cingular Wireless LLC (“Cingular”) and its
various subsidiaries and affiliates. The Applicants
assert that the transfer of control of the vast
majority of Cingular’s licenses and authorizations
will be non-substantial (i.e., pro forma) in nature
and that the Commission’s rules and precedents require
only post-consummation notification rather than
advance consent for the proposed transaction.
Nevertheless, the Applicants have filed applications
seeking advance consent out of “an abundance of
caution.”

These transfer of control applications were filed in
connection with a proposed acquisition whereby AT&T
will acquire BellSouth. At closing, a wholly owned
subsidiary of AT&T will be merged with and into
BellSouth, with BellSouth being the surviving entity.
Each share of common stock of BellSouth will be
converted into 1.325 shares of AT&T common stock.
BellSouth thus will become a wholly owned subsidiary
of AT&T. While AT&T will become the new parent of
BellSouth, BellSouth will continue to own the stock of
its subsidiaries, and BellSouth and its subsidiaries
will continue to hold all of the FCC licenses and
authorizations that they hold prior to the merger.

In addition, by combining the separate interests AT&T
and BellSouth currently have in Cingular, that entity
will become a wholly owned subsidiary of AT&T.
Cingular will continue to hold all of its current
interests in its subsidiaries and affiliates, and
Cingular, its subsidiaries, and its affiliates will
continue to hold all of the FCC licenses and
authorizations that they hold prior to the merger.

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

RFC: Federal Plan for Cyber Security and Information Assurance Research and Development

http://www.nitrd.gov/

Public comment on the Plan is welcome during a
two-week comment period. Please send any comments to
csia-plan-comments@nitrd.gov before April 28, 2006.

The National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), a
Cabinet-level Council that coordinates science and
technology policies across the Federal Government,
today released the Federal Plan for Cyber Security and
Information Assurance Research and Development. This
report sets out a framework for multi-agency
coordination of Federal R&D investments in
technologies that can better secure the interconnected
computing systems, networks, and information that
together make up the U.S. information technology (IT)
infrastructure.

“This country’s IT infrastructure – which includes not
only the public Internet but also the networking and
IT systems that control critical infrastructures
ranging from power grids to emergency communications
systems – is vital not only to our national and
homeland security but to our economic security,” said
John H. Marburger III, Science Adviser to the
President and Director of the Office of Science and
Technology Policy. “This report provides a blueprint
for coordination of Federal R&D across agencies that
will maximize the impact of investments in this key
area of the national interest.”

The Federal Plan for Cyber Security and Information
Assurance outlines strategic objectives for
coordinated Federal R&D in cyber security and
information assurance (CSIA). The Plan presents a
broad range of CSIA R&D technical topics and
identifies those topics that are multi-agency
technical and funding priorities. The Plan’s findings
and recommendations address R&D priority-setting,
coordination, fundamental R&D, emerging technologies,
roadmapping, and metrics. Together with commentaries
about the CSIA R&D technical topics that describe
their significance, the current state of the art, and
gaps in current capabilities, these elements provide a
baseline for implementing the Plan’s recommendations.

The Plan was prepared by the Interagency Working Group
(IWG) on Cyber Security and Information Assurance
(CSIA), whose members represent more than 20
government organizations. The CSIA IWG operates under
the auspices of the NSTC’s Subcommittee on
Infrastructure and Subcommittee on Networking and
Information Technology Research and Development
(NITRD). The Federal Plan for Cyber Security and
Information Assurance Research and Development is
available on the NITRD Program Web site: http://www.nitrd.gov/.

Thursday, April 13, 2006

FCC RFC: Petition for Limited Waiver Filed by Country Code 1 Enum LLC

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-839A1.doc

DA 06-839
April 12, 2006

PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR COMMENTS ON PETITION
FOR LIMITED WAIVER FILED BY COUNTRY CODE 1 ENUM LLC

CC Docket No. 99-200

Comments Due: April 28, 2006
Reply Comments Due: May 5, 2006

On March 28, 2006, Country Code 1 ENUM LLC (“ENUM
LLC”) filed a petition for limited waiver with the
Commission to allow ENUM LLC to obtain North American
Numbering Plan (NANP) numbering resources. The
petition requests that the Wireline Competition Bureau
grant a limited waiver of section 52.15(g) of the
Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(g), to allow
ENUM LLC to obtain numbering resources directly from
the Pooling Administrator to be used in conjunction
with a trial of ENUM technology within the Country
Code 1 North American Numbering Plan.

This Public Notice establishes the procedural
requirements relating to consideration of ENUM LLC’s
petition. This matter shall be treated as a
“permit-but-disclose” proceeding in accordance with
the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§
1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing
the presentations must contain summaries of the
substance of the presentations and not merely a
listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or
two sentence description of the views and arguments
presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. §
1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose
proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b).

. . . . .

=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
Cybertelecom :: Federal Internet Law & Policy www.cybertelecom.org

Washington Youth Hockey News arlhoc.blogspot.com

Monday, April 03, 2006

FCC Release Data on Internet Broadband

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264738A1.doc

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION RELEASES DATA ON
HIGH-SPEED SERVICES FOR INTERNET ACCESS

High-Speed Connections to the Internet Increased from
37.9 Million to 42.9 Million Lines in the First Half
of 2005

Washington, D.C. – The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) today released new data on high-speed
connections to the Internet in the United States.
Twice a year, facilities-based broadband providers
report the number of high-speed connections in service
pursuant to the FCC’s local telephone competition and
broadband data gathering program (FCC Form 477).
Statistics released today reflect data as of June 30,
2005.

All facilities-based providers of high-speed
connections to end users were required to report to
the Commission basic information about their service
offerings and types of customers as of June 30, 2005.
Previously, providers with fewer than 250 high-speed
connections in service in a particular state were not
required to report data for that state. More than
twice as many holding companies and unaffiliated
entities reported information about high-speed
connections as of June 30, 2005 as had reported six
months earlier.

For reporting purposes, high-speed lines are
connections that deliver services at speeds exceeding
200 kilobits per second (kbps) in at least one
direction, while advanced services lines are
connections that deliver services at speeds exceeding
200 kbps in both directions. The June 30, 2005 data
provide more information about the “speeds” of
advanced services lines and finer distinctions among
technologies than previously reported. They also
enable, for the first time in this data collection,
estimation of the extent to which high-speed Digital
Subscriber Line (DSL) connections are available to
households residing in the areas served by incumbent
local exchange carriers (ILECs) and the extent to
which high-speed cable modem service is available to
households residing in the areas served by cable TV
systems.

1) Advanced Services Lines

· Advanced services lines, which deliver
services at speeds exceeding 200 kbps in both
directions, increased by 31% during the first half of
2005, from 28.9 million to 37.7 million, compared to a
23% increase, from 23.5 million to 28.9 million lines,
during the second half of 2004. For the full twelve
month period ending June 30, 2005, advanced services
lines increased 60% (or 14.2 million lines).

· Of the 37.7 million advanced services lines
reported as of June 30, 2005, 61.8% were at least 2.5
mbps in the faster direction and 38.2% were slower
than 2.5 mbps in the faster direction.

· Of the 37.7 million advanced services
lines, 34.3 million served primarily residential end
users. Cable modem service represented 64.9% of these
lines while 33.9% were asymmetric DSL (ADSL)
connections, 0.5% were symmetric DSL (SDSL) or
traditional wireline connections, 0.2% were fiber
connections to the end user premises, and 0.5% used
other types of technology including satellite,
terrestrial fixed or mobile wireless (on a licensed or
unlicensed basis), and electric power line.

2) High-Speed Lines

· High-speed lines, which encompass advanced
services lines and also lines that deliver services at
speeds exceeding 200 kbps in one, but not both,
directions, increased by 13% during the first half of
2005, from 37.9 million to 42.9 million lines in
service, compared to a 17% increase, from 32.5 million
to 37.9 million lines, during the second half of 2004.
For the full twelve month period ending June 30,
2005, high-speed lines increased by 32% (or 10.4
million lines).

· Of the 42.9 million total high-speed lines
reported as of June 30, 2005, 38.5 million served
primarily residential end users. Cable modem service
represented 61.0% of these lines while 37.2% were ADSL
connections, 0.4% were SDSL or traditional wireline
connections, 0.2% were fiber connections to the end
user premises, and 1.1% used other types of technology
including satellite, terrestrial fixed or mobile
wireless (on a licensed or unlicensed basis), and
electric power line.

3) Geographic Coverage

· As a nationwide average, we estimate that
high-speed DSL connections were available to 76% of
the households to whom ILECs could provide local
telephone service as of June 30, 2005, and that
high-speed cable modem service was available to 91% of
the households to whom cable system operators could
provide cable TV service.

· Providers list the Zip Codes in which they
have at least one high-speed connection in service to
an end user, and 98% of Zip Codes were on the list of
at least one provider. Our analysis indicates that
more than 99% of the nation’s population lives in
those Zip Codes. The most widely reported
technologies by this measure were satellite (with at
least some presence reported in 86% of Zip Codes),
ADSL (in 78% of Zip Codes), and cable modem (in 62% of
Zip Codes). ADSL and/or cable modem connections were
reported to be present in 85% of Zip Codes.

The summary statistics released today also
include state-by-state information, and population
density and household income information ranked by Zip
Codes. As additional information becomes available,
it will be posted on the Commission’s Internet site.

The report is available for reference in the FCC’s
Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445
12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. Copies may be
purchased by calling Best Copy and Printing, Inc. at
(800) 378-3160. The report can also be downloaded
from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical
Reports Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats.

- FCC -

=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
Cybertelecom :: Federal Internet Law & Policy www.cybertelecom.org

Washington Youth Hockey News arlhoc.blogspot.com